Careless driving means conduct that falls below the standard expected of a careful and competent motorist. It can range from a brief lapse in attention to more obvious errors that compromise safety or fall short of the standard of careful driving. No deliberate recklessness is required – even an unintentional misjudgement, such as braking too late or drifting out of lane, can be enough for a charge to follow.
A conviction can lead to between 3 and 9 penalty points, a fine, or a discretionary disqualification. For motorists who already have points on their licence, reaching 12 within three years can trigger a totting-up ban of at least six months. See our Exceptional Hardship Application page for guidance on how to avoid disqualification.
If the incident involved an accident or collision, the police may invite you to a voluntary interview under caution. It is important to seek expert legal advice at that stage to ensure you take the right approach and protect your position.
Contact our specialist motoring solicitors today for immediate advice. Call 0333 240 7373, email [email protected], or complete our online contact form to arrange a consultation.
What is Careless Driving?
A person commits the offence if they drive a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other road users (section 3, Road Traffic Act 1988).
Driving is considered careless if it falls below the standard expected of a competent and careful driver (section 3ZA(2)). The test is objective – it looks at the driving itself, not the driver’s intentions.
Typical examples recognised by the Crown Prosecution Service include:
- Overtaking on the inside
- Driving too close to another vehicle
- Driving through a red light by mistake
- Turning into the path of another vehicle
- Being avoidably distracted (for example by tuning the radio or lighting a cigarette)
- Misjudging a turn at a junction or roundabout
- Attempting an unsafe overtake
- Using or handling a mobile phone while driving
There can be a fine line between careless driving and dangerous driving – it comes down to the degree in which the driving was said to fall below that of a competent driver. See our Dangerous Driving Solicitors page for further details.
Defences
The prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the standard of driving fell below that expected of a competent and careful driver. In many cases, the evidence can be challenged.
Possible defence arguments include:
Conduct of other road users contributing to the incident: The defence may argue that another road user’s actions caused or contributed to the situation. For example, a pedestrian stepping into the road, or a vehicle braking or changing lanes without warning, may leave no reasonable chance to avoid contact.
Challenging the Reliability of the Prosecution’s Evidence: This can include errors or omissions in police procedure, flaws in collision-reconstruction analysis, or gaps in the evidence itself. For example, dash-cam footage or witness statements might show that another vehicle crossed the centre line first, or that the alleged lapse was less serious than described in police reports. Such issues can undermine the reliability of the prosecution’s case.
Challenging Whether Driving Fell Below the Standard of a Careful Driver: Even if the facts are accepted, the defence may argue that the driving did not fall below the standard expected of a competent and careful driver. This often arises where a minor misjudgement occurs – for example, mistiming a gap or adjusting speed slightly late without causing danger.
Mechanical failure or sudden obstruction outside the driver’s control: For example, a burst tyre, steering fault, or debris in the road leading to a brief loss of control. The defence would argue that the incident was not caused by a lack of care or attention.
How Reeds Solicitors Can Help
Every careless driving case turns on its individual facts and the quality of the evidence. Early legal advice can make a crucial difference – whether to challenge the allegation entirely or to prepare effective mitigation that protects your licence.
Our specialist motoring solicitors have dealt with hundreds of careless and dangerous driving cases and understand exactly how these cases are assessed, and the many factors that can influence the outcome. We always aim to exceed expectations of client care and achieve the best possible result in every case.
If you are facing a careless driving offence or charge, contact our motoring law specialists today for clear, confidential advice. Call 0333 240 7373, email [email protected], or complete our online contact form to arrange a consultation.
Minor lapse (e.g. clipping a kerb, hesitation, brief distraction): usually 3-4 points and a small fine.
Moderate lapse (e.g. low-speed collision, late braking, poor lane change): usually 5-6 points or a short discretionary ban.
More serious lapse (e.g. causing danger or injury, prolonged inattention): usually 7-9 points, a larger fine, and a higher risk of disqualification.
Totting-up risk: reaching 12 or more points within 3 years normally leads to a 6-month driving ban.
Driver improvement course: sometimes offered instead of prosecution in less serious cases.
Insurance and record: a conviction stays on your driving record and can increase premiums.
Sentence categories:
The court will determine the appropriate sentence by assessing the driver’s culpability and the harm caused, in line with the Sentencing Council guideline for Careless Driving – Drive without due care and attention.
• Category 3 – lower culpability and lesser harm: Band A fine, 3-4 penalty points.
• Category 2 – medium culpability or medium harm: Band B fine, 5-6 penalty points.
• Category 1 – higher culpability and/or greater harm: Band C fine (or higher), 7-9 penalty points, and the court must consider disqualification.
When deciding sentence, the court will consider any circumstances that make the offence more or less serious.
Aggravating factors may include:
- Excessive speed or aggressive manoeuvres
- Distraction by mobile phone or other in-car device
- Involvement of vulnerable road users such as cyclists or pedestrians
- Previous driving convictions or poor record
- Driving while fatigued or under time pressure
Mitigating factors may include:
- Momentary lapse in otherwise safe driving
- Adverse weather or visibility conditions
- Clean licence and responsible history
- Genuine remorse and early guilty plea
- Hardship to others caused by disqualification
Camera or CCTV Allegations
If the police believe you were driving without due care and attention, the process may begin with a Notice of Intended Prosecution (NIP) sent to the registered keeper within 14 days of the alleged offence. This is most common where the driving was captured on police-controlled CCTV, a safety camera, or other automated footage, and no officer stopped the driver at the time.
If the police were present and gave a verbal warning that you may be prosecuted, that satisfies the legal requirement and no written NIP is issued.
Collisions or Witness Reports
Where the incident involved a collision with another vehicle or person, or has been reported through witness evidence, you may instead be invited by the police for a voluntary interview under caution to provide your account before any charging decision is made.
Single Justice Procedure (SJP)
If the case proceeds by way of a Single Justice Procedure, you will receive a Single Justice Procedure Notice (SJPN) and normally have 21 days to respond with a plea of guilty or not guilty. If you plead guilty and the matter is straightforward, the court can impose penalty points and a fine without a full hearing.
When a Full Hearing is Required
If disqualification is being considered – for example, because the offence involved a collision, injury, or you already have points putting you at risk of a totting-up ban – the case will be listed for a full court hearing, where you can attend in person, address the magistrates, and present mitigation before sentence is passed.
Mundi v Warwickshire Police [2001] EWHC Admin 448
The defendant’s car crossed the central white line and he was convicted after trial in the magistrates’ court. He appealed by way of case stated to the High Court, arguing that the magistrates were wrong to find him guilty. The court dismissed the appeal, holding that without a satisfactory explanation, crossing the white line is strong evidence of careless driving.
The case highlights the relatively low threshold for careless driving and the importance of providing a clear and credible explanation for any lapse in driving to successfully defend an allegation.
DPP v Tipton Divisional Court [1992] 1 WLUK 79
Where a vehicle veered off course during an overtaking manoeuvre and collided with a car the driver of which was not at fault, the only reasonable inference in the absence of any evidence from the driver of the offending vehicle, who had no memory of the events, and in the absence of any evidence of a defect in the vehicle, was that he had driven carelessly.
This case shows that even without deliberate recklessness, the threshold for careless driving can be met.
DPP v Parker Divisional Court [1989] 5 WLUK 314
The defendant’s vehicle struck the car in front when traffic ahead came to a sudden stop, and several other drivers in the same line also collided. He did not attend trial, but the justices acquitted, finding that a reasonable and prudent motorist could have been involved in such an incident and that the prosecution had not proved the case beyond reasonable doubt.
The decision illustrates that a collision alone does not necessarily amount to careless driving – the court must still be satisfied that the standard of driving actually fell below that of a competent and careful driver.
Our specialist motoring solicitors represent clients facing careless driving allegations across England and Wales. With over 20 offices nationwide, including in Oxford, London, Manchester, Bristol, Cardiff, and other major population centres, we can assist wherever your case is heard.
We regularly act for motorists appearing at magistrates’ courts throughout the country and can arrange initial consultations either remotely or in person.
We can set up initial consultations with you remotely or in person and will ensure your case is handled by a specialist motoring solicitor familiar with the local court.
Get in touch
Information is processed inline with UK GDPR and our Privacy Policy
FAQ
The key difference lies in how far the standard of driving falls below what would be expected of a competent and careful driver, and whether the driving created an obvious risk of danger.
Careless driving (under section 3 of the Road Traffic Act 1988) occurs when the driving falls below the standard expected of a careful driver. It usually involves a lapse of attention, misjudgement, or momentary error – for example, following another vehicle too closely, failing to signal, or making an unsafe manoeuvre.
Dangerous driving (under section 2 of the same Act) is more serious. It means the driving fell far below the expected standard, and that it would be obvious to a competent driver that such driving was dangerous. This can include excessive speed, racing, aggressive overtaking, or driving while knowingly unfit to do so.
Not automatically. Most careless driving convictions result in penalty points (between 3 and 9) rather than an immediate ban. However, the court does have the discretion to impose a driving disqualification if the offence is considered particularly serious – for example, if it involved a collision, injury, or prolonged inattention.
If you already have points on your licence, the new offence could take you to 12 or more points within a three-year period. In that situation, you face a minimum six-month ‘totting-up’ disqualification unless you can successfully argue exceptional hardship – showing that a ban would cause serious difficulties for you or others who depend on you.
Our motoring solicitors are highly experienced in preparing exceptional hardship applications and can advise on whether one could apply in your case.
Yes, points can be avoided if the case is successfully defended, or if the police or CPS agree not to proceed with a prosecution. Where the driving itself is admitted, the police may in some lower-level cases offer a Safe and Considerate Driving Course (part of the National Driver Offender Retraining Scheme) instead of prosecution or penalty points.
This is entirely at police discretion and is usually considered only where the lapse was minor, no injury occurred, and the driver has not attended a similar course within the last three years.
You cannot apply for a course yourself, but a solicitor can make representations asking the police to consider one. These are most effective if made early, before a prosecution decision or Single Justice Procedure Notice (SJPN) is issued. While late representations can be made, once proceedings begin it is far less likely that a course will be offered.
If a course is accepted and completed within the deadline, there is no conviction, fine, or penalty points.
Yes, in limited circumstances. Special reasons are exceptional factors linked to how the offence was committed that can persuade the court not to impose penalty points or a disqualification, even after a guilty finding.
They must relate directly to the incident – not to personal hardship – and must not amount to a complete legal defence. Typical examples might include a misleading signal from another driver, a brief lapse while responding to an emergency, or a situation where a vehicle defect contributed to the incident but did not entirely excuse it.
Whether something qualifies as a special reason is ultimately a matter of judicial judgment. The court applies this test strictly, so specialist legal advice is important before raising it.
Yes, careless driving is an endorsable motoring offence that stays on your DVLA driving record and must usually be declared to insurers when applying for or renewing a policy.
Insurers cannot automatically view your record unless you give permission through the DVLA MyLicence system, which lets them confirm any endorsements and penalty points. Otherwise, they rely on your disclosure in the application.
Points count towards totting-up for 3 years, but the endorsement remains on your record for 4. Many insurers ask about motoring convictions from the last 5 years, so you may still need to declare it even after it has expired for DVLA purposes.
Premiums often rise at renewal after a careless driving conviction, particularly if the offence involved a collision, injury, or higher number of points. The extent of any increase varies between insurers.
If the new careless driving offence takes you to 12 or more points within three years, you face a minimum six-month totting-up disqualification unless you can show exceptional hardship.
See our Exceptional Hardship Solicitor page for more information.
Yes, a conviction for careless driving is recorded by the court and appears on your DVLA driving record, but it is classified as a non-recordable offence under the Road Traffic Act 1988. This means it is not entered on the Police National Computer (PNC) and will not appear on a basic or standard DBS check, and is very unlikely to appear on an enhanced DBS check unless directly relevant to the role being considered.
In legal terms, it is still a criminal conviction, but it is not treated as part of a criminal record for most disclosure or employment purposes. The endorsement – usually coded as CD10 (driving without due care and attention) or CD30 (driving without due care and attention, causing injury) – remains on your DVLA record for 4 years and must usually be declared to insurers.
Most employers do not require disclosure of spent convictions or minor motoring offences, though certain regulated or professional roles may still ask about them.
Yes, most careless driving cases are dealt with under the Single Justice Procedure (SJP), which allows you to respond in writing without having to attend court in person. The notice will explain the charge and give you 21 days to enter a plea online or by post.
If you plead guilty by post, a single magistrate can usually deal with the case on the papers and impose penalty points and a fine. However, if disqualification is being considered — for example, because the offence is serious or you already have points putting you at risk of a totting-up ban — the court will list the case for a full hearing where you will need to attend in person.
It is always advisable to seek legal advice before entering a plea. A solicitor can review the evidence, confirm whether the alleged driving meets the legal test for “careless”, and prepare mitigation to reduce the penalty or help you keep your licence.
In careless driving cases, the police may rely on several types of evidence, including:
- Police officer observations at the scene or from reviewing footage.
- Dash-cam or CCTV recordings showing the manner of driving or any collision.
- Witness statements from other road users or pedestrians.
- Collision reports, photographs, or vehicle telematics data showing speed, braking, or steering.
- Expert collision-reconstruction analysis.
The prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that your driving fell below the standard expected of a competent and careful driver. A solicitor can review and, where possible, challenge the accuracy or reliability of the evidence.
Most careless driving cases take around two to four months from the initial notice to conclusion, though the timescale depends on the complexity of the case and whether it goes to court.
Simpler cases dealt with under the Single Justice Procedure are often resolved sooner, while those involving contested evidence, a risk of disqualification, or a full hearing before magistrates can take several months longer.